For months we have taken our health care reform message to our nation’s leaders, hospital associations and government health agencies: National health reform should include the public reporting of all hospital infection rates.
Our message caught on! A coalition of House Democrats have included public reporting of hospital-acquired infections in their reform bill (HR 3200), and reducing payment to hospitals that aren’t doing enough to prevent infections. Some key details:
Two House lawmakers helped set the stage for including infection-prevention in the health reform bill by introducing legislation that would require hospitals to take stronger action to reduce infections.
Last month, Representative Jackie Speier (D-CA) introduced a bill (HR 2937) to screen certain patients for MRSA and to make hospital-specific infection rates public. Representative Tim Murphy (R-PA) re-introduced his bill (HR 3104) to require public reporting of hospital-acquired infections without pre-empting related state laws. (Pennsylvania has set a good example for how hospital infection public reporting works at the state level, producing several hospital-specific reports since 2005). Key elements of the Speier and Murphy bills are included in the House health care reform bill.
House Democrats are expected to pass their committee-approved version of the bill soon. As the fight continues on the Senate side, public reporting of hospital infections is one element of health care reform that should not be compromised by politics. CU’s Healthcare Reform Director, DeAnn Friedholm, told Inside Health Policy:
At long last, this bill offers a national response to this deadly problem, by providing public information on what each local hospital is doing to stop these unnecessary deaths. The light of publicity will enable consumers—and dedicated medical staffs—to insist on major quality reforms.